Post by eti800 on Feb 11, 2024 23:48:48 GMT -7
Many managers and people constantly wonder how companies learn. It is not an easy question to answer and, before answering it, we should ask ourselves why some companies learn and others do not.
There are two modes or states in the nature of any living being or organization that determine the learning process. Indeed, the way companies learn will be affected depending on the mode they are in. We talk about survival mode or well-being mode.
Those companies that enjoy a stable position in the market and whose survival is not in danger, seek to improve aspects of the business that result in the improvement Denmark Email List of indicators referring to the quality of the business and working conditions. The behavior of this type of company is totally different from that of those companies that struggle to grow or survive. The way they learn too. company. The clearest example, in the field of the digital economy, is seen in the contrast between startups and incumbents .
Learning from companies in survival mode.
It can be said that the same company shows differences in its behavior and, therefore, in its way of learning, if it is in a competitive niche of struggle for survival or well-being (stability).
Companies in survival situations have higher quality learning, especially at the moment when access to the essential resource sought for the business occurs. For example, a big sale or a big mistake. In both cases, what should or should not be done is recorded in the organization.
In survival environments, companies are capable of learning and working with high aversive stimuli, since in survival environments, the search for security is one of the priority generators of learning. Social relationships tend to be more tense, conflictive and interested (target-focused).
It is easy to exemplify this state with ourselves. In survival environments, it is common to generate enormous efforts to obtain basic necessities, for example, long walks to fetch water. In these situations, back pain is not important. For the first world, where the well-being mode prevails, mild cervical pain can be a real drama.
Learning from companies in survival mode.
Organizations that are in a state of well-being or comfort have a worse response to major threats, since the alertness and stress they cause seem excessive and unusual. However, they will generate a better attitude and greater learning when they are offered something that provides extra well-being. For example, an improvement in profitability, an increase in customer or employee satisfaction.
They also learn best with low aversive stimuli that work as a nuisance. For example, inefficiencies, complaints, returns,….
An important difference in how companies learn depending on the mode they are in, is that companies that are in a state of survival lean towards more individualistic learning processes aligned with personal objectives, while those companies that are in In well-being environments they generate more collective learning processes that arise from the company's general strategy .
There are two modes or states in the nature of any living being or organization that determine the learning process. Indeed, the way companies learn will be affected depending on the mode they are in. We talk about survival mode or well-being mode.
Those companies that enjoy a stable position in the market and whose survival is not in danger, seek to improve aspects of the business that result in the improvement Denmark Email List of indicators referring to the quality of the business and working conditions. The behavior of this type of company is totally different from that of those companies that struggle to grow or survive. The way they learn too. company. The clearest example, in the field of the digital economy, is seen in the contrast between startups and incumbents .
Learning from companies in survival mode.
It can be said that the same company shows differences in its behavior and, therefore, in its way of learning, if it is in a competitive niche of struggle for survival or well-being (stability).
Companies in survival situations have higher quality learning, especially at the moment when access to the essential resource sought for the business occurs. For example, a big sale or a big mistake. In both cases, what should or should not be done is recorded in the organization.
In survival environments, companies are capable of learning and working with high aversive stimuli, since in survival environments, the search for security is one of the priority generators of learning. Social relationships tend to be more tense, conflictive and interested (target-focused).
It is easy to exemplify this state with ourselves. In survival environments, it is common to generate enormous efforts to obtain basic necessities, for example, long walks to fetch water. In these situations, back pain is not important. For the first world, where the well-being mode prevails, mild cervical pain can be a real drama.
Learning from companies in survival mode.
Organizations that are in a state of well-being or comfort have a worse response to major threats, since the alertness and stress they cause seem excessive and unusual. However, they will generate a better attitude and greater learning when they are offered something that provides extra well-being. For example, an improvement in profitability, an increase in customer or employee satisfaction.
They also learn best with low aversive stimuli that work as a nuisance. For example, inefficiencies, complaints, returns,….
An important difference in how companies learn depending on the mode they are in, is that companies that are in a state of survival lean towards more individualistic learning processes aligned with personal objectives, while those companies that are in In well-being environments they generate more collective learning processes that arise from the company's general strategy .